Is it really possible to select the next big artist solely based on data? On one hand, some will contend that numbers do not lie. However on another hand, some will argue that raw undiscovered talent still exists today. A company discussed in The Guardian's article “ Music Analytics is helping the music industry see into the future” explains how they believe the music industry can determine which artist is the next big thing utilizing data. The name of this company is Music Metric. They are known as a “London based start up that offers tools to help those within the music industry understand consumer behavior and opinion.”
I
agree, that Music Metric’s utilization of online data to discover artist makes
it a valuable tool for the music industry, however I do not believe that only
through data stats can we define the next big artists. One example that is
relevant is the discovery of Kendrick Lamar. This year west coast hip-hop
artist Kendrick Lamar’s album M.A.A.D City contended for the 2014 GrammyAwards. However when Dr.Dre first discovered Kendrick Lamar he only had 300
fans. However, Kendrick Lamar still managed today to become the next big
thing. If Dr.Dre would have by
passed the opportunity to work with Kendrick Lamar based on data, he may have
missed out on an opportunity to work with the next big. In short, at a point
talent cannot be denied. Therefore we still need human A&R’s, to help
choose talent. I only say that because if A&R’s become algorithms, how will
they feel music? In addition how
will an algorithm recognize star qualities and traits?

No comments:
Post a Comment