Just recently 24-year-old pop star Taylor Swift pulled her
entire catalog from Spotify.
Spotify is a digital music streaming service that provides listeners
with millions of songs at their fingertips. Despite the fact that, fans enjoy
Spotifiy’s services, artist is not happy. Taylor Swift has vocally voiced her opinion in numerous
interviews. Taylor Swift is convinced that music-streaming services don’t value
her art. (Business Insider, 2014) At the same time, Taylor Swift is certain that
Spotify could hurt music sales. Her argument that Spotify could hurt music
sales is supported by the fact that artist are not even making half of what
they could make from an album sale.
Retail sites such as iTunes offer artist albums for $9.99, while Spotify
provides artist a payment of $.007 per stream. Essentially, this proves that
this model undervalues the artist worth. Even more importantly it’s showing the
direction of where the music industry is heading. As consumers demand for
digital streaming services increase it makes it more difficult for artist to make
a profit from their works. Granted the IFPI views the digital download model as
a “ key revenue stream”, digital
downloads are declining. In the last year the IFPI stated “ Revenues from downloads
globally fell slightly by 2.1 percent in value, the decline being offset by
increases in streaming and subscription revenue”. Obviously it is clear that the
streaming and subscription model is here to stay. Nevertheless in today’s mixed
economy of revenue streams Taylor Swift should be able to find a solution to
her problem with Spotify.
At the same time Taylor Swift should also confront Universal Music Group about the financial terms of her royalties. Granted Spotify may have made a payment to her label the head of the label takes a proportion as well due to their overhead costs.

No comments:
Post a Comment